Jump to content

Talk:Brabourne Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeBrabourne Stadium was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
June 3, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Main Picture

[edit]

There are decent pictures in the public domain providing an aerial view of the stadium. Such a picture should be used as the main picture for this article.

Head Office

[edit]

... has the offices of the BCCI, the head organisation of Indian cricket

Doesn't Brabourne house THE headquarters of the BCCI ? If yes, this point should be given more stress. Tintin 16:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Capacity of the stadium

[edit]

Cricinfo and some other online sources put the capacity of the Brabourne Stadium as 20,000, but according to the sources 1 & 3 in the references listed in the article it was built to accomodate 35,000 people. This is another source which puts it as 35,000 while an article about a Rolling stones concert has it as 25,000. We need to find the correct figure. Tintin (talk) 06:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think some Wikipedian in Mumbai should contact the ground authorities & get the exact figure.

Thanks

Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 06:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nichalp mentioned here that 20,000 is the more likely figure, but if we get it confirmed it would be great. Tintin (talk) 07:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm

[edit]

(In 1937) The stadium was named after Brabourne at the suggestion of the Maharaja of Patiala.

Then what was the immortality that De Mello offered Lord Brabourne ? Tintin 13:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Offered by De Mello on Patiala's suggestion. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

[edit]

Copyedited per request at GOCE requests page. Move on to nominate and start the process for GA status. Easwarno1 (talk) 01:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Brabourne Stadium/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BrianDeeG (talk · contribs) 19:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC) I will review the article. I have given it a quick, initial read but can make no comments at this stage. I am on a short holiday at present and will be able to pursue the process in a few days time. --Brian (talk) 19:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Initial survey

[edit]

I have immediate concerns that will have to be addressed before I can perform an in-depth review. There is no bibliography as required by WP:MOS and this must list all books used for reference. The style of the citations must then be changed to, for example, <ref>Knox, pp.152–153.</ref>. The way that the online citations has been handled is fine except that these heavily outnumber the book references and I see this as a concern. I would expect an article about a 75-year old stadium to be based mainly on book references and this needs to be addressed too.

"See also" sections are generally deprecated so you should find some way of incorporating those articles into the main narrative if possible.

In the "further reading" section, the first item should be an "external link" while, in any case, it is incorrectly titled and it does not link to a list of matches. Given the titles of the second and third items, I would expect these to provide citations in the article and they should be used instead of online alternatives where possible. The fourth title may be similar and, as a minor point, the author's name is a redlink which needs to be addressed. I noticed another couple of redlinks elsewhere in the article. Another minor point is the failure to comply with WP:CRIC re its style guide as "Test" is written "test".

I will put the article ON HOLD for the time being. --Brian (talk) 13:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Failed

[edit]

There has been no activity on the article or any response to the concerns I raised a week ago. I am therefore failing the article and would suggest that the points above are addressed as the next stage of the article's development. --Brian (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claim that it was India's first sporting avenue

[edit]

The article says Brabourne Stadium was built on 90,000 square yards of reclaimed land[6] along Marine Drive[7] near Churchgate railway station in South Mumbai[8] and was India's first permanent sporting venue.[9][10] do no sound to be true or factual as other cricket grounds for example Eden Gardens at Kolkata existed since 1864. Jethwarp (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brabourne Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brabourne Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brabourne Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Brabourne Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brabourne_Stadium&oldid=1212399161"